Evidence Fall 2022

Casebook Credits History Find

Change history

November 6th, 2022
- Edited Hearsay articles on Moodle
August 15th, 2022
- Added OPTIONAL: Behind the State Bench (Report)
August 10th, 2022
- Added OPTIONAL: Proposed NY Law to make rap lyrics presumptively inadmissible
July 28th, 2022
- Edited Evidence Course Overview
July 26th, 2022
- Edited Video Instructions for Moodle
July 25th, 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 25
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 22
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 21
- Removed The only assignment for Class 23 is to complete Sample Quiz 4. from Evidence Fall 2022
- Removed Class 23 (Quiz 4) from Evidence Fall 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 20
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 19
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 18
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 17
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 16
- Removed The only assignment for Class 17 is to complete Sample Quiz 3 from Evidence Fall 2022
- Removed Class 17 (Quiz 3) from Evidence Fall 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 15
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 14
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 13
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 11
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 10
- Removed The only assignment for Class 11 is to complete Sample Quiz 2. from Evidence Fall 2022
- Removed Class 11 (Quiz 2) from Evidence Fall 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 9
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 8
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 7
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 6
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 5
- Removed Only assignments for Class 5 is to complete Sample Quiz 1 from Evidence Fall 2022
- Removed Class 5 (Quiz 1) from Evidence Fall 2022
- Edited Rule 105
- Edited Evidence in Context: Four-Part Video
- Added Proposed Change to Rule 801(d)(2) from a CUNY Law student
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 24
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 23
- Added Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
- Added OPTIONAL: This Rap Song Helped Sentence a 17-Year-Old to Prison for Life
- Added Proposed Change to Rule 404(b) from a CUNY Law student
- Added Proposed Change to Rule 609 from a CUNY Law student
- Added OPTIONAL: EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO CHALLENGE COMMONLY INTRODUCED EVIDENCE USED IN SUPPORT OF GANG ALLEGATIONS
July 16th, 2022
- Added Emoji are showing up in court cases exponentially, and courts aren’t prepared
April 11th, 2022
- Added OPTIONAL: The trial of Sir Walter Ralegh: a transcript
April 5th, 2022
- Removed Comprehension Questions Set 23 from Evidence Spring 2022
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 22
April 2nd, 2022
- Removed Instructions for Hearsay descriptions on Moodle from Evidence Spring 2022
- Added Hearsay articles on Moodle
March 31st, 2022
- Removed OPTIONAL for Class 19 from Evidence Spring 2022
March 2nd, 2022
- Edited Sample settlement letters
February 19th, 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 16
January 26th, 2022
- Edited Excerpt from Killer Mike's amicus brief to the Supreme Court
January 21st, 2022
- Added Evidence Course Overview
January 19th, 2022
- Added Video Instructions for Moodle
- Added Enroll in our Moodle course
January 18th, 2022
- Edited Merritt & Simmons Textbook Assignment
January 8th, 2022
- Edited Comprehension Questions Set 26
- Removed Comprehension Questions 26 from Evidence Spring 2022
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 25
January 6th, 2022
- Removed VIDEO: Evidence rules in context from Evidence Spring 2022
- Added Evidence in Context: Four-Part Video
January 5th, 2022
- Removed Course Overview from Evidence Spring 2022
- Removed Comprehension Questions Set 1 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Added 2022 Evidence Introductory Survey
- Added Comprehension Questions #1
January 3rd, 2022
- Removed Comprehension Questions 27 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 25 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 24 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 23 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 21 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 20 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 19 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Reyes v. Missouri Pacific Railroad from Evidence Fall 2020
- Edited Highlighting recent change to Rule 404(b)
- Removed Comprehension Questions 18 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 17 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 15 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 14 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 13 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 12 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 10 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 9 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 8 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 7 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 6 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 4 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Edited Edited version of motions in the Casey Anthony case
- Removed Comprehension Questions 3 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Government's response to Paul Manafort's motion in limine from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Paul Manafort's motion in limine from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 2 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Order on Manafort's motion in limine from Evidence Fall 2020
- Removed Comprehension Questions 1 from Evidence Fall 2020
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 25
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 24
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 23
- Added OPTIONAL: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers' Objection to Rule 801(d)(1)(B)
- Added OPTIONAL: Discussion of Rule 801(d)(1)(C) from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 21
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 20
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 19
- Added Discussion of Rule 404(b) from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added Rule 104(b)
- Added Rule 404(b)
- Added OPTIONAL: Discussion of Character Evidence from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added OPTIONAL: Justice of the Peace: Why Federal Rule of Evidence 404(A)(2)(C) Should Be Repealed
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 18
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 17
- Added OPTIONAL: Let My Love Open the Door: The Case for Extending Marital Privileges to Unmarried Cohabitants
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 15
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 14
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 13
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 12
- Added Discussion of Rule 407 from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 10
- Added OPTIONAL: Discussion of Rule 609 from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 9
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 8
- Added OPTIONAL: Discussion of Rule 613 from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 7
- Added OPTIONAL: The Demeanor Gap: Race, Lie Detection, and the Jury,
- Added OPTIONAL: The Courtroom as White Space: Racial Performance as Noncredibility
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 6
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 4
- Added Discussion of Relevance from: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF THE MARYLAND RULES ON BLACK AND BROWN INDIVIDUALS
- Added OPTIONAL: Translating Yonnondio by Precedent and Evidence: The Mashpee Indian Case
- Added OPTIONAL: The Impact Of Gruesome Photographs On Mock Jurors’ Emotional Responses And Decision Making In A Civil Case
- Added OPTIONAL: Paul Manaford motion in limine
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 3
- Added OPTIONAL: Commonwealth v. Williams
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 2
- Added OPTIONAL: Another set of jury instructions defining evidence
- Added Comprehension Questions Set 1
- Added Excerpt from State's Motion in Limine in State of Minnesota v. Derek Michael Chauvin
July 20th, 2020
- Casebook first published.

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.