Main Content
C. The Institutional Injunction in Prisoners’ Rights Cases
4.2.2.4
C. The Supreme Court Interprets Federal Defense Removal Jurisdiction under the 1875 Act and its 1887 Amendment in Accordance with its Systemic Preference for Direct Review
3.2.2.4
C. Which Issue Should be Decided First: Constitutional Violation or Remedy?
4.2.3.5
D. Certification
4.1.4.5
D. Congress Replaces Direct Review as of Right (Writ of Error) with Discretionary Review (Writ of Certiorari) (1916, 1925)
3.2.1.5
D. General Federal Question Jurisdiction and Remedies under the Act of March 3, 1875
3.3.1.5
D. Justice Stevens’ Nonjurisdictional, Nonconstitutional Explanation of Edelman Based on a Federalism Balancing Analysis of Remedies
4.2.4.5
D. Pretrial Habeas Corpus as a Functional Substitute for Removal?
3.2.2.5
D. Should Procedural Default Doctrine on Habeas Review be Similar to Procedural Default Doctrine on Direct Review?
5.1.2.5
D. Some Questions
5.1.3.5
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.