Main Content
Matthew Rimmer, Intellectual property and self-driving cars: Waymo vs Uber: Supplementary submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Industry, Innovation, Science and Resources' inquiry into the social issues relating to land-based driverless vehicles in Australia (2017)
9.7
https://eprints.qut.edu.au/107502/1/Supplementary%20Submission%20Rimmer%20on%20Waymo%20v%20Uber.pdf
Matthew Sag, дуЦInternet Safe Harbors and the Transformation of Copyright Lawду» 93 Notre Dame L Rev 1 (2017)
12.13
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=458117106069071089118096085102081118051053051021058043068127072104101114011076090102036054032126054012052112026024084103076010038007053017081068019118005029087076059059048092110102012006096084017070115092121120087070019110097100115125100079070121003&EXT=pdf
Matthew Scherer, Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies, 29(2) Harvard J. of L. & Tech. 354 (2016)
2.6
https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=249000000081125029123095124081091065040082022002039016066110030100116081109010115095122031018004012045098002028107115127104117051027045019081113110112082111002088126040046041081087070092118093112069065097085064020011023095016069091104024107093072066001&EXT=pdf
Michael Kearns, Data Intimacy, Machine Learning, and Consumer Privacy (Penn Law CTIC Research Paper, 2018)
5.4
https://www.law.upenn.edu/live/files/7952-kearns-finalpdf
Mirjana Stankovic, Ravi Gupta, Bertrand Rossert, Gordon Myers and Marco Nicoli, White Paper: Exploring Legal, Ethical and Policy Implications of Artificial Intelligence (Global Forum of Law, Justice and Development, World Bank, October 2017)
2.3
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mirjana_Stankovic2/publication/320826467_Exploring_Legal_Ethical_and_Policy_Implications_of_Artificial_Intelligence/links/59fbf3d4a6fdcca1f2930ad3/Exploring-Legal-Ethical-and-Policy-Implications-of-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf
Muse Blockchain
10.5
https://soundac.io/
Nari Lee, Protection for Artificial Intelligence in Personalised Medicine – The Patent/Trade Secret Trade Off (December 13, 2019) in Schovsbo, Jens, Minssen, Timo and Thomas Riis (eds), ‘The harmonization and protection of trade secrets in the EU – An Appraisal of the EU Directive’ (Edward Elgar, Forthcoming)
8.2
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3553846
Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018)
3.1
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/04/23/16-15469.pdf
Naruto v. Slater, No. 16-15469 (9th Cir. 2018)
4.3
http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/04/23/16-15469.pdf
Pamela Samuelson, Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works, 47 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1185 (1986)
6.4
https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2067&context=facpubs
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.