New! H2O now has access to new and up-to-date cases via CourtListener and the Caselaw Access Project. Click here for more info.

Main Content

Torts

Garratt v. Dailey

            Battery is an intentional tort. But what does the law mean by intent?

            In this case, a child, Brian Dailey, took a chair as his aunt tried to sit down. She fell to the ground and hurt herself. What would it mean for Brian to have intent? Must have he wanted for his aunt to fall? To get hurt? Does intent in tort law mean the same thing you might expect to see in criminal law—or in daily life? And why does tort law define intent the way it does?