New! H2O now has access to new and up-to-date cases via CourtListener and the Caselaw Access Project. Click here for more info.

Main Content

Torts

Class 11

Introduction to Negligence: The Reasonable Person and Breach

            Negligence is perhaps the defining claim of American tort law. Most simply, negligence requires defendants to meet a duty of reasonable care. But what does it mean to demand that a person act reasonably?  Should we factor in an individual’s disability, age, race, sex, or personal experience in defining what is reasonable under the circumstances? Is there a consistent or coherent way to define a duty of reasonable care?

            We will take up the influential (but always controversial) idea that to behave reasonably is to make those choices that cost-benefit analysis requires. Does this idea capture the values that justify what is unquestionably an expensive tort system?