Scheduled Maintenance Notice: H2O will be undergoing maintenance on Weds, July 30. Some features may be temporarily unavailable during this period. Thank you for your understanding.

Main Content

Casebook Read Credits
Criminal Procedure Fall 2021
Resource 11 . 2
25 minutes

Ohio v. Robinette, 519 US 33 (1996)

C.E. Field

Must a driver be told that the traffic stop is over (and that they are free to leave) before gaining consent to search the car?

Supreme Court says no.  Voluntariness of consent is determined by TOTC, not a bright-line rule.

On remand, the OH Supreme Court held that under a TOTC analysis, Robinette did not voluntarily consent, as he "merely submitted to a claim of lawful authority." (State v. Robinette, 80 Ohio St. 3d 234 (1997), citing Royer, 460 U.S. at 497.)

Supreme Court of the United States
519 U.S. 33, 136 L. Ed. 2d 347, 117 S. Ct. 417, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 6971, SCDB 1996-005
No. 95-891
1996-11-18

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.