Albert v. Spencer

This case also involves the identical use of a trademark, but comes out differently. Why? Is this the right conclusion? Could the plaintiff have made better arguments?Note that trademarks may infringe even if they are not identical. These examples are merely used to show the analysis of factors

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.