Main Content
Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd. (2d Cir. 2006)
8.7
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/primary_materials/cases/GrahamKindersley.pdf
Brief of Google Inc. in Support of Motion for Final Approval of Amended Settlement Agreement
6.2
http://www.thepublicindex.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/docs/amended_settlement/google_final_approval_support.pdf
Brin & Page, The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine (1998)
2.11
http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/361/1/1998-8.pdf
Cahn v. Sony complaint (1990)
3.2
http://www.thepublicindex.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/docs/letters/nimmerC.pdf
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
8.4
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/case.pdf
Charles Arthur, 90:9:1 – the odd ratio that technology keeps creating, The Guardian, 12/12/15
1.7
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/12/ratio-technology-mozilla-firefox-os-90-9-1
Chart of copyright term
1.2
http://copyright.cornell.edu/resources/docs/copyrightterm.pdf
Copyright Office, Orphan Works and Mass Digitization report (June 2015)
12.1
http://copyright.gov/orphan/reports/orphan-works2015.pdf
Copyright Office, Report on Orphan Works (2006)
2.3
http://copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report-full.pdf
Disney, Microsoft Lead Copyright Pact, The Wall Street Journal (10/19/07)
3.11
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119269788721663302
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.