Main Content
Prosecutor v. Ðorđović, ICTY, Trial Chamber II, Case No. IT-05-87/1-T, Public Judgement with Confidential Annex—Vol. I of II, February 23, 2011, paras. 1521–1526, 1531–1580
8.1.2
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/djordjevic/tjug/en/110223_djordjevic_judgt_en.pdf
Prosecutor v. Gotovina and Markač, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, Case No. IT-06-90-A, Judgment, November 16, 2012, paras. 2–5, 23–84
5.3.3
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/gotovina/acjug/en/121116_judgement.pdf
Prosecutor v. Strugar, ICTY, Trial Chamber, Case No. IT-01-42-T, Judgment, January 31, 2005, paras. 79–214, 218–330, Annexes I–IA, III.C–D [skim]
5.7.1
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/strugar/tjug/en/str-tj050131e.pdf
Prosecutor v. Tadić, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, Case No. IT-94-1, Decision on Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, October 2, 1995, paras. 66–70
3.3.2
http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC, Trial Chamber I, Case No. ICC-01/04-01/06, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, March 14, 2012, paras. 503–567 [skim]
3.1.10
http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200104/related%20cases/icc%200104%200106/court%20records/chambers/trial%20chamber%20i/pages/2842.aspx
Public Committee Against Torture in Israel and Palestinian Society for the Protection of Human Rights and the Environment vs. Government of Israel, HCJ 769/02 [Isr.], Judgment, December 13, 2006.
4.1.2
http://elyon1.court.gov.il/Files_ENG/02/690/007/a34/02007690.a34.htm
Raffi Khatchadourian, “The Kill Company,” The New Yorker, July 6, 2009, pp. 40–59
7.3.6
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/07/06/the-kill-company
Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004)
13.8.5
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?q=Rasul+v.+Bush,+542+U.S.+466+(2004)&hl=en&as_sdt=40000006&case=13489903449749466109&scilh=0
Robert Chesney, “Who May Be Killed? Anwar al-Awlaki as a Case Study in the International Legal Regulation of Lethal Force,” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 13, 2013, pp. 3–60
13.3.4
http://search.proquest.com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/docview/917440741/fulltextPDF/7D04A68D69D64547PQ/1?accountid=11311
Robert Sloane, “The Cost of Conflation: Preserving the Dualism of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in the Contemporary Law of War,” Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, Issue 1, Winter 2009, pp. 47–112
13.4.2
http://www.yale.edu/yjil/files_PDFs/vol34/Sloane.pdf
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.