United States v. Tibbs

D.C. Superior Court (2019)

This 2019 opinion is useful because it: (a) describes the differences between the Daubert and Frye standards; (b) provides an unusual example of a judge delving into the Daubert factors; and (c) offers a critique of courts’ Daubert analyses.

(You can skip pages 54-56.)

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.