Main Content
Restatment of Contracts (2d) Restitution When Other Party in Breach
Restatement of Contracts (Second)
- 373 Restitution When Other Party Is in Breach
Note: The current position of the American Law Institute concerning “restitution” as a remedy for breach of contract is set forth in Restatement Third, Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (R3RUE), formally adopted in 2010 and published in 2011. Contract remedies treated in the new Restatement include rescission for material breach (R3RUE §§ 37, 54) and damages to protect both the “reliance interest” and the “restitution interest” (R3RUE § 38), as well as a potential liability in unjust enrichment to disgorge the profits of an “opportunistic” breach of contract (R3RUE § 39).
(1) Subject to the rule stated in Subsection (2), on a breach by non-performance that gives rise to a claim for damages for total breach or on a repudiation, the injured party is entitled to restitution for any benefit that he has conferred on the other party by way of part performance or reliance.
(2) The injured party has no right to restitution if he has performed all of his duties under the contract and no performance by the other party remains due other than payment of a definite sum of money for that performance.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.