5 Non-Immigrant (temporary) Visas 5 Non-Immigrant (temporary) Visas
5.1 Visas and Intent 5.1 Visas and Intent
INA §§ 214(a)-(b): "Admission of Nonimmigrants" INA §§ 214(a)-(b): "Admission of Nonimmigrants"
8 USC § 1184
INA § 221: "Issuance of Visas" INA § 221: "Issuance of Visas"
8 USC § 1201
INA § 222: "Application for Visas" INA § 222: "Application for Visas"
8 USC § 1202
INA § 248: "Change of Status" INA § 248: "Change of Status"
8 USC § 1258
5.1.1. USA.Gov: Apply for Nonimmigrant Visas
5.1.2. Citizen Path: Dual Intent Visa & Non-Immigrant Intent
5.1.3. Citizen Path: 90 Day Rule & Adjustment of Status
5.1.4. Justice.Gov: Matter of Hosseinpour (BIA 1975)
5.1.5. NY Times: They Grew Up Legally But Can’t Stay After 21 (Excerpt)
The excerpt alone is sufficient to review if you have an issue with the paywall.
Content warning: suicide, family separation, racism, xenophobia
Excerpt:
They Grew Up Legally in the U.S., but Can’t Stay After They Turn 21
Children of temporary visa holders who can’t gain permanent residency are one of several groups urging the Biden administration to act on an immigration overhaul.
By Aishvarya Kavi
April 30, 2022
WASHINGTON — In 2011, after five years of working and living with his family in the United States on a temporary visa, Barathimohan Ganesan submitted green card applications for his wife, his 5-year-old daughter and his 11-year-old son.
Mr. Ganesan, who was born in India and has also lived in Singapore and Australia, was nervous about when his wife and children might gain permanent residency. He knew the waiting list was especially long for Indians on his kind of visa, an H-1B, which allows American companies to employ skilled foreign workers. Because of chronic backlogs, it can take years to process those on work visas who apply for permanent residency.
Last year, a decade after he applied, Mr. Ganesan, his wife and his daughter received their green cards. But his son had turned 21 and missed the cutoff by months, leaving him scrambling for a visa that would allow him to stay in the United States.
Mr. Ganesan’s son is among more than 200,000 children who grew up in the country under the protection of their parents’ temporary visas, which can be renewed indefinitely. But the children risk losing their legal status when they turn 21. Unable to become permanent residents because of the backlogs or because they were never eligible, they must obtain a different visa, remain in the United States without legal status or leave entirely. According to the Cato Institute, more than 10,000 children age out of green card eligibility each year; untold numbers eventually depart, often leaving their families behind.
These young people do not qualify for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Created by executive action during the Obama administration, the DACA program protects from deportation about 650,000 youths, or Dreamers, who were brought into the United States and have remained without legal status. Because the program requires applicants to be undocumented, it does not offer those with legal status a way to stay.
A comprehensive immigration overhaul is highly unlikely to pass a deadlocked Congress in a midterm election year. The Biden administration has been under increasing pressure as a Trump-era public health order, known as Title 42, is set to be lifted in late May, a move that is expected to create a surge of migration across the southwestern border. A bipartisan group of senators restarted immigration discussions on Thursday to try to identify stand-alone proposals that would have the support of both parties.
When asked on Thursday whether the administration — which is updating DACA — was considering extending protections to documented youths, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the homeland security secretary, told the House Judiciary Committee that the department did not plan to do so. Its focus was “to fortify the existing DACA program” and shift responsibility for documented youths to Congress, he said, adding that their situation spoke to “the imperative to pass immigration reform.”
In interviews, more than a dozen people who lived in the United States on temporary visas from a young age described their struggles with anxiety and the financial burden of navigating how to remain in the country they considered home. They are urging the Biden administration, if it will not provide a path to citizenship, to offer a way for them to legally remain in the country.
Mr. Ganesan’s son, Niranjan Barathimohan, is able to stay in the United States until November only because immigration officials extended his dependent visa. Mr. Barathimohan, a student at the University of Texas at Dallas, will have to go to Singapore, where he was born, to apply for a student visa that will allow him to return and finish his degree.
His application might be rejected; since he previously tried for a green card, he has shown an intent to immigrate to the United States, which is not allowed. Applicants may be asked to show that they intend to leave the country after completing their courses. Mr. Barathimohan faces the prospect of being stuck in Singapore, where he has no family or roots.
“How is he going to manage alone?” Mr. Ganesan said. “I was really devastated that just because of my country of birth, my son’s opportunities are very limited.”
While there are protections to keep families together when parents move to the United States on temporary work visas, those end when children turn 21 because they are no longer considered part of the family unit.
“I don’t think people who originally wrote the laws foresaw a situation where children brought here on visas would be raised and educated here, but not have a clear opportunity to stay and become Americans,” said Dip Patel, the founder of Improve the Dream, an organization that campaigns for a path to citizenship for those children. “Delay in taking action will not only lead to tearing more families apart, but also continue the immense emotional turmoil faced by thousands of families.”
. . .
5.2 Ethics 5.2 Ethics
5.2.1. American Bar Association (ABA): Model Rules of Professional Conduct
5.2.2 [ * Discussion Qs: N/A (Ethical Dimensions of Immigration Practice) * ] 5.2.2 [ * Discussion Qs: N/A (Ethical Dimensions of Immigration Practice) * ]
University of Minnesota Human Rights Practice, Chapter 15,
Copyright © 2004 David Weissbrodt and Laura Danielson
Questions to Consider:
(1) The non-citizen is in violation of his or her immigration status, or has fraudulently married to gain permanent resident status. Must the lawyer report his or her client to the immigration authorities?
(2) A non-citizen consults the lawyer about admission to the United States. The client is qualified for a student visa, but in discussing the non-citizen’s ultimate objectives, the lawyer learns that the client may want eventually to become an immigrant and a United States citizen. If the non-citizen has a present intent to immigrate to the United States, he or she would be ineligible for the student visa. What should the lawyer tell the client?
(3) An immigration lawyer is paid by a company to obtain a visa for an employee or potential employee. In the course of the representation the lawyer learns facts--such as the employee's career plans--which may be adverse to the new employer's interest. What should the lawyer do? Can he or she tell the employer? Whom does the lawyer actually represent?
5.2.3 [ * Research Qs: N/A (Ethics) * ] 5.2.3 [ * Research Qs: N/A (Ethics) * ]
"The hypothetical yesterday that I introduced in class was what you would do if you have a client who tells you that they have the wrong (improper) immigrant intent for the temporary / nonimmigrant visa application that they are asking you, as their attorney, to fill out. Specifically, they tell you that they will stay in the United States, legally or illegally, if they do not receive permanent status and their nonimmigrant / temporary visa is not extended.
- Do you help them fill it out or not?
- If the answer is no, some people questioned why you can defend someone who tells you that they have committed a crime in the criminal law context? Please research why that might be the case.
- There was also the question of whether, if you decide not to fill it out, you are required to report the client to the court or to the relevant immigration authorities? Please also figure that out."