United States v. Connor, 811 Fed.Appx. 787 (3d Cir. 2020)

This case provides helpful context for understanding the similar motive and cross-examination requirements of the former testimony exception.

Note that one of the Comprehension Questions for today asks: What did the Connor case add to your understanding of the ”similar motive” requirement?)

This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.