Main Content
Merck v. Glenmark (Delhi HC, 2015)
4.4
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/91986422/
Micromax v. Ericsson (CCI order, 2013)
14.7
http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CCI-Case-no-50-2013.pdf
Miguel Helft & Shan Carter, “A Chief Executive’s Attention to Detail, Noted in 313 Patents,” New York Times, August 25, 2011.
2.3
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/26/technology/apple-patents-show-steve-jobss-attention-to-design.html
Munzer and Raustiala, “The Uneasy Case for Intellectual Property Rights in Traditional Knowledge” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 27 (2009), pages 56-84
13.5
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1397367
Natco Pharma Ltd. v. Bristol Myers Squibb Holdings Ireland Unlimited (Delhi HC, 2019)
8.4
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/183720579/
National Research Development Corporation of India, New Delhi v. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Limited and Others (Delhi HC, 1979)
8.5
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/608642/
Novartis AG and others v. Union Of India & Others (SC, 2013)
3.3
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/
Novartis AG and others v. Union Of India & Others, (SC, 2013)
4.3
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/
Novartis AG and others v. Union Of India & Others, (SC, 2013)
5.4
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/
Novartis v. Natco Pharma (Delhi HC, 2019)
7.3
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/184497595/
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.