Main Content
Zapata v. Maldonado
Zapata is the leading case on the legal standard a court will apply to a special litigation committee's motion to take control over derivative litigation following following the 23.1 motion to dismiss and prior to going to trial. Look at the facts related to the interestedness and independence of directors on the special litigation committee. Consider whether under these same facts demand would have been deemed futile with respect to these directors at the 23.1 motion to dismiss stage.
This book, and all H2O books, are Creative Commons licensed for sharing and re-use with the exception of certain excerpts. Any excerpts from the Restatements of the Law, Principles of the Law, and the Model Penal Code are copyright by The American Law Institute. Excerpts are reproduced with permission, not as part of a Creative Commons license.